For those not familiar with the issue, starting with the QUICK
READ Section is recommended. |
|
MISSION STATEMENT
The PonyTail Institute for Change (pi4c) was officially registered in Fairfax County, Virginia on November 18, 1996 for the purposes of social and political sensitization. Predicated on the premise that at its most fundamental level it
is the individual, the I's, me's of this world, that are the root cause of
many, if not most, of the problems of this planet, and that simplicity is
the essence of perfection, the Institute seeks to effect change at the unit
level, the individual, through increasing the sensitivity of the individual
to the fundamental causes of problems and providing support necessary
for the individual to grow and thereby reduce that individual's contribution
to the problem. It is the one thing each and every individual can do.
Cumulatively ... At this juncture, however, the pi4c is engaged in a life and death struggle. I, Keith B. Davis, founder, director, and currently the sole member
of pi4c am conducting the PonyTail HUNGER-STRIKE FOR JUSTICE, a protest
of what in reality is a death sentence imposed upon me by those in control
of the government of the state of minnesota and those in control of the
united states government, (capitalization deliberately omitted).
The above is an excerpt from the last page of the opinion by which I was suspended from the practice of general law by the state of minnesota. The patent and trademark office rubber stamped the so-called opinion. One lied. The other swore to it. The so-called opinion is unlawful on its face. Should anyone trouble themselves to go beyond that face, they would find that any such "psychiatric" problem issue had been expressly excluded as an issue in the proceedings. The trial/hearing judge (a District Court Judge), had denied a Rule 35 Motion for Mental examination sought by the state. I had not objected to the motion. The only caveat I had put on that issue was that the state pay for an expert witness of my choice, and pay for my time because my practice was very young. The law clearly gave me the right to have my own expert witness present (the tests are very subjective, Rohrshock ink blot and the like). Let's put this mental thing to rest once and for all. About 5
years prior to the Rule 35 disciplinary proceeding motion of the above
paragraph, as part of divorce proceedings, I had been through this psychiatric
testing drill. I characterize the process as one of each side getting a
hired gun (expert witness) and they go into court and have a shoot out.
We did. My ex's experts said yes he is. Mine said no he isn't. The judge
said nothing. The last is the most significant. That judge issued a proper
decision, one which included findings of fact, and conclusions of law. He
made no direct finding whatsoever relating to the psychiatric issue. He inferentially
did so when he found I was a "fit parent". THE MAJOR LIES: I. That at the time in question, I had psychiatric problems which rendered me incompetent, or was otherwise incompetent, to represent clients in the state of minnesota. At best, an unproven allegation. In fact, calculated character assasination and business libel. A MAMMOTH LIE. One lied. The other swore to it. II. That if I in fact had psychiatric problems, I would not seek appropriate treatment. The court, and that is taking major liberties with the word, correctly wrote that there was "no evidence that [I] was disposed to submit to psychiatric or other medical treatment." (Literally true, but misleading.) Of course there wasn't any evidence. The matter had been specifically excluded from issue during pre-trial. A MAMMOTH LIE. One lied. The other swore to it. Every proper judicial proceeding of this type should follow the following progression: 1) allege it; 2) prove it; 3) incorporate it into a finding(s) of fact; 4) incorporate it into conclusions of law; and 5) incorporate it into the final order. "They" omitted the first four steps. I defy anyone to compare the so-called opinion to any recognized standard for essential elements in a decision, such as those undoubtedly provided to newly appointed judges. The entire so-called opinion is A MAMMOTH LIE. One lied. The other swore to it. The so-called opinion had to have been written before the trial on the merits, and almost certainly was written before the pre-trial hearing at which the Rule 35 Motion for mental examination was denied. A very calculated, pre-meditated MAMMOTH LIE. One lied. The other swore to it. The so-called opinion includes fifty two denigrations. At best, if one could succeed in comprehending them, and with one possible exception, probably boiler plate assertions that apply to every person who has ever practiced law. In reality, totally unrelated to "instability" or "psychiatric". It is as though they are gratuitous. The exception may be those which relate to my asking two clients to provide me with AFFIDAVITS OF GOOD FAITH. Their official position was that asking the clients to sign a very simple affidavit was intimidation. In reality, an admission that the client could not sign the affidavit without committing perjury. A MONSTROUS PACK OF LIES. One lied. The other swore to it.
THE EXECUTION: TRIPARTITE SYSTEM OF CHECKS & BALANCES: After exhausting all legal appeals, the judicial branch of government, by definition, was the problem. It could not be said whether it was the problem because of an inherit flaw, or because it was controlled by evil people acting with malice. In all events, I sought to test the checks and balances theory of our government, that having a tri-partite form of government, that three separate and equal branches of government would protect the citizens of this society from the excesses of one branch of government. Pursuant to the 1st Amendment Constitutional right to "petition
the government for a redress of grievances", the issue of the UNLAWFUL
suspensions was presented to the Executive and Legislative branches of government
in a variety of ways. suffice it to say that, if anything, the response
to each such "petition" was to compound the injury.
TELE: 651 296 3391 or 800 657 3717 FAX: 651 296 2089 email: jesse.ventura@state.mn.us |
PRESIDENT | ATTORNEY GENERAL | TREASURY SECRETARY |
TELE: 202 456 6797 | TELE: 202 514 2063 | TELE: 202 622 0064 |
FAX: 202 456 1907 | FAX: 202 514 4507 | FAX: 202 622 0073 |
email: president@whitehouse.gov | email: NONE | email: OPCMail@do.treas.gov |
JULY 14, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 171/164; VOICE
[BODY SHUTDOWN=164 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 15, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 172/165; REVERSE
[BODY SHUTDOWN=165 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 16, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 173/166; EXECUTION This Daily Message (DM) shall tie together a number of the DMs which relate to the EXECUTION aspect. Hopefully, a full development of the matter will be possible in the days ahead. Actually, "they" employ not a simple mode of execution, but a compound mode. In discussing the matter, a virtual mantra has been that "their" strategy has been to keep me barefoot and pregnant, meaning totally without resources to fight back. And, the Daily Messages (DM's) have addressed various forces which have been employed the normal and logical consequence of which, unless abated, would surely cause death. For example, the January 28 DM was titled "STRESS KILLS" and an immersion in STRESS INDUCING stimuli and a converse deprivation of every STRESS ELIMINATING stimuli was reported in the February 1 DM. This latter DM also noted that the experience has been an emotional beating which was the full equivalent of the Rodney King physical beating. More recently, the June 15 and July 2 DMs refer to the wearing away of granite by mere drops of water. As a practical matter, there has been no abatement. Without stonewalling none of those things could happen! Without MURDEROUS STONEWALLING none of those things could happen!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=166 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 17, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 174/167; RAINCHECK
[BODY SHUTDOWN=167 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 18, 1999 - PRAYER JULY 19, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 176/169; INAPPROPRIATE
[BODY SHUTDOWN=169 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 20, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 177/170; COLLAGE 3
HONORABLE MENTION GOOD CITIZENSHIP AWARDS: the numerous individuals I have seen in the last few weeks picking up their dog's doo doo. In this immediate area I am personally aware that less thoughtful and responsible individuals have created a significant problem for the venturous young, those compelled for time constraints to take a short cut, and the less nimble of foot and otherwise needing to do a shortest distance between points A and B gig. NOMINATION FOR HALL OF SHAME MEMBERSHIP: the my dog's doo doo is somebody else's doo doo to pick up kings and queens. INDUCTEES INTO THE HALL OF SHAME: those responsible for the Big Gulp Litter which the Wilson's were picking up which prompted the June 21st award - at least presumptively - identical litter appeared at the identical spot on two other occasions.
[BODY SHUTDOWN=170 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 21, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 178/171; BURN
[BODY SHUTDOWN=171 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 22, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 179/172; EXECUTION II
The elapsed time without a response from the primary stonewallers is as follows:
Major stonewalling execution strategies shall be discussed in subsequent DMs! Major MURDEROUS STONEWALLING execution strategies shall be discussed in subsequent DMs!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=172 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 23, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 180/175; MOURNING
[BODY SHUTDOWN=175 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 24, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 181/174; SOCIETY?
[BODY SHUTDOWN=174 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 25, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 182/175; CONSCIENCE
Would anyone dispute that in the formula for a collective conscience the elected leaders of the society would be a significant factor? And if those elected leaders engage in stonewalling ...! And if those elected leaders engage in MURDEROUS STONEWALLING ...!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=175 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 26, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 183/176; SPECTACLE
One of the Marquee Issues of the Daily Messages, replacement of the elective process with a lottery/draft selection method (by means of a Constitutional Amendment) has been mentioned in four prior DMs, towit: FEBRUARY 1, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 8/1; SHUTDOWN COMMENCEMENT/O_ME MARCH 19, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 54/47; THANK YOU MATTI GOLAN APRIL 26, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 92/85; 6 BITS JUNE 29, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 156/149; COLLAGE 2 Extraction of the titles of those four DMs was the final straw. Before the sun sets next Sunday, the websites shall have a Marquee Issue Section! For newcomers to the DM, the lottery/draft selection issue proposes a Constitutional Amendment which would fill political positions from pools of qualified candidates. Briefly, the pools would be large enough to insure that the process would not be compromised by special interests. Instead of pouring funds down a rat hole for campaign financing, a fraction of those funds would be used to extensively train the entire pool. Note the incidental benefit to the society of those not selected from the pool, a large number of people vastly more knowledgeable about their government and having acquired leadership skills applicable to their every day personal and business lives. Some of course would fill lesser positions. For example, in the case of the pool for president, would not these people be well qualified to serve as ambassadors with only slightly more ambassador specific training! The lottery/draft process has many other benefits which shall eventually be collected from existing DMs and transferred to, and otherwise more fully developed in, the Marquee Issue Section. And, the reason for this digression immediately following an expression of the urgent need for focusing on the "of necessity priority" uno#1 escape from the death sentence issue, all the media attention to the pending legislation dealing with how the trillion dollar windfall is to be spent. Are not the Republicans, with their "TAX CUT" emphasis, the absolute epitome of the "WE WANT MORE" bunch? Are not the Democrats, with their artfully voting block targeted spending programs, the "WE WANT MORE VOTES" bunch? What think you readers? It is this spectacle which prompts this DM. Now, conjure up a Senate, House, and President selected by the lottery/draft process. Envision the forces which would drive the debates over how the trillion dollar windfall should be applied. What think you readers? Better or worse for the society? I wouldn't pose the questions if I wasn't 100% positive of the result myself!!! I also think that with such a process there wouldn't be any stonewalling! I also think that with such a process there wouldn't be any MURDEROUS STONEWALLING!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=176 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 27, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 184/177; UNFORGIVEABLE
[BODY SHUTDOWN=177 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 28, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 185/178; MECHANISM
[BODY SHUTDOWN=178 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 29, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 186/179; EXECUTION III
[BODY SHUTDOWN=179 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 30, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 187/180; WHICH JUDGE
Which judge said "you're in our city now"? Which judge said "and now we'll see about your health"? Which judge said, incredulously, "ordinarily that is enough"? Which judge may have pulled strings behind the scenes because of a love triangle? And, would we have stonewalling without judges like these? And, would we have MURDEROUS STONEWALLING without judges like these???
[BODY SHUTDOWN=180 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JULY 31, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 188/181; OLD SAWS
[BODY SHUTDOWN=181 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 1, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 189/182; WHEELS
[BODY SHUTDOWN=182 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 2, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 190/183; DE FACTO FASCISM
Virtually every society is politically goulash, a little of this, a little of that, and a lot of something. My concern is the degree to which we are politically a de facto fascist society. Without reservation, qualification, or condition, the one thing this society is not, is a merit society. Merit is the exception in this society. By definition, any society in which the circumstance of birth predominantly determines the quality of life of the individual is not a merit society. Would anyone dispute that far and away the majority of those born into poverty in this society die in poverty? Again we are talking about a matter of degree so, of course, to some degree every society is a merit society but this time the concern is the lack rather than the excess of the degree. Is not merit an exact opposite of arbitrary? Would anyone argue that get along, go along is not merit? Would anyone argue that Political Correctness (PC) is not merit? Would anyone argue that get along, go along and PC have been the behavior of choice during at least the past several decades? Is not the PonyTail case proof positive of the degree of intolerance in this society for one who rejects get along, go along and political correctness? Is not stonewalling the epitome of arbitrariness! Is not MURDEROUS STONEWALLING the epitome of arbitrariness!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=183 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 3, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 191/184; REPRESENTATIVE
From time to time the truculent bureaucrats condescendingly point out that we have a representative form of government, as though we are oblivious to that fact. Yes, we do indeed have a representative form of government. What they have lost sight of, is that the intention was for the people, THE PEOPLE, to be represented in the government. Special interests have representation. People per se do not. People only have representation to the extent they are included in a special interest group. Stonewalling in response to a person's petition for redress of a grievance is not representation! MURDEROUS STONEWALLING in response to a person's petition for redress of a grievance is not representation!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=184 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 4, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 192/185; RIGHT TO PETITION
[BODY SHUTDOWN=185 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 5, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 193/186; KUDOS
[BODY SHUTDOWN=186 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE APPROX 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 6, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 194/187; SIX DECADES
[BODY SHUTDOWN=187 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS=24%] [VICTIM'S AGE=60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 7, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 195/188; LOTTERY/DRAFT
FEBRUARY 1, 1999 Select our representatives by drafting them. Establish a pool of qualified candidates and select representatives by drafting them. I have been advocating this theory for some time, on some occasions using a lottery selection metaphor. (I have increasingly become enamored with the notion of a society walking up to an individual and saying, ok buster/busterette, get your affairs in order, you are going into training and you may be spending the next 4, 6, 8 years doing something else. I really like the notion of that. A lot.) MARCH 19, 1999 Those who have followed the issue closely will know the sentiments resonate with me and perhaps even recall comments about the need for a Constitutional Amendment which would address this issue specifically. For those joining the Daily Message thread mid-stream, the Daily Message for February 1, 1999 proposes replacing the "elective" process for selecting public officials with a draft or lottery selection process as a mechanism for eliminating the sytem which allows powerful interests to control a supposedly democratic society. APRIL 26, 1999 BEST RECEIVED CONCEPT: replacement of the elective system with a lottery/draft selection system; JUNE 29, 1999 And, the crown jewel of the que'd messages: The solution to the fascist element inherent in any "election selection process" form of democratic government is to replace elections with a lottery/draft selection process from a pool of qualified candidates so large that it can not be compromised. The thing that really tickles my funny bone, is the likelihood that Russia would become Democratic before the United States. I can not see ourselves changing our beloved Constitution that radically in anything less than 10 years. All "emerging" democracies, including Russia, can draft a Constitution with a lottery/draft selection process in a heartbeat. Would not the greatest benefit from a lottery/draft selection process be in the dregs, the residue left over? Let's say that the pool size for president is one thousand (1000). Instead of pouring campaign funds down a rat hole, significantly less funds would be used to train candidates and afterwards we would have 999 statesmen left over. Over a period of time, would that not create a very sophisticated society!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MARCH 9, 1999 [money as] a virtual condition of access to the bureauacrcy. MAY 5, 1999 The poor do not have access to government. ... The politically incorrect do not have access to government. ... The elite have access to government. We know [arbitrary] elitism is fascism. MAY 9, 1999 ELECTED politicians act[ing] not on the merit of matters, but rather on that which ensures their political survival. MAY 9, 1999 The privilege we have referred to almost exclusively is that of "ACCESS" to government, and our complaint is really not that they [the "elite"] have access, but rather that in reality they have it exclusively. JULY 19, 1999 A specific charge has been levied in the DMs that our democratic process is seriously flawed because it reserves virtually exclusive access to government to the elite (some using it judiciously, others not). ... At least one member of mainstream media recently, and icily I might add, referred to his being a member of the elite who "had access to government". AUG. 1, 1999 We still have campaign finance problems. AUG. 1, 1999 We still have pols devoting virtually all their time, energy and resources to their own political preservation.
[BODY SHUTDOWN=187 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 8, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 196/189; HELP
[BODY SHUTDOWN=189 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 9, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 197/190; STATUS
MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS', these numbers are!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=190 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 10, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 198/191;
[BODY SHUTDOWN=191 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 11, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 199/192; SCOFFLAW
[BODY SHUTDOWN=192 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 12, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 200/193; TOXICITY
This latter phenomena appears to present a second potassium issue. Your material included the following:
Your observations please, including relating the objective symptoms to their respective conditions if there are in fact two conditions we are dealing with and they conveniently associate themselves with one or the other - fat chance, right? kbd/PT ------------------------------------- 2nd input from source:
ULTIMATE CONCLUSIONS: A crush injury destroys cell membranes and thus the above "release". Tissue breakdown includes a breakdown of cell membranes and thus a "release", also. Because my GROSS caloric intake is comparatively normal, and because my diet may even be hyper potassium, it is more likely than not that a hyper, vis a vi, hypo potassium condition shall result from tissue breakdown. Of course, should anyone be aware that this reasoning is false or otherwise have comments which they deem pertinent, please email me at:pi4ckbd@erols.com
[BODY SHUTDOWN=193 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 13, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 201/194; WOOD SHED
How many times do you have to be told to stop trying to make the symptom go away! How many times do you have to be told to start trying to eliminate the cause of a problem! Causes yes, symptoms no, Janet! I do not presume to be an expert in this area. I do have enough life experiences that I know there are at least two causal factors of gun related violence. Factor one: the individual is sick. Factor two: the individual is provoked. Of course, sometimes, and probably in most instances, both factors are present. Provoked is used in a sense inclusive of alienation. Acts which alienate an individual also have a capacity to provoke the individual. Your statement not only does not address these causal factors, nor any other causal factors, but, indeed, has a capacity to provoke and thus to exacerbate rather than ameliorate the problem. Your statement was made for the sole purpose of political expediency. Your statement is a classic example of why "elective process" democracy does not work and must be replaced with the lottery/draft process form of democracy discussed in numerous prior daily messages. (The pi4c web site Marquee Issue, Selection section.) Your statement is what one would expect of a stonewaller! Your statement is what one would expect of a MURDEROUS STONEWALLER!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=194 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 14, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 202/195; SELF EVIDENT
[BODY SHUTDOWN=195 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 15, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 203/196; LEVEL
Speak now, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, or forever be known as a cur which stuck its tail between its legs and slunk off!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=196 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 16, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 204/197; STATUS
MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS', these numbers are!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=197 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 17, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 205/198; NEVILLE
[BODY SHUTDOWN=198 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 18, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 206/199; APPEASEMENT
II
[BODY SHUTDOWN=199 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 19, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 207/200; APPEASEMENT
III
If one does not act when one should act in order to "buy off" those who are in control, does one appease? Yes, and this is in the nature of appeasement by non-feasance, isn't it, a genuine negative two-fer. Do the stonewallers stonewall for the purpose of appeasement, for the purpose of serving their selfish interests, or for a combination of appeasement and serving their selfish interests? Do the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS stonewall for the purpose of appeasement, for the purpose of serving their selfish interests, or for a combination of appeasement and serving their selfish interests???
[BODY SHUTDOWN=200 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 20, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 208/201; NONE
[BODY SHUTDOWN=201 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 21, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 209/202; NOTICE
[BODY SHUTDOWN=202 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 23, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 211/204; SABBATICAL
[BODY SHUTDOWN=204 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 30, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 218/211; PREMISES
If the stonewallers have any problems with these premises, let them speak now or forever hold their peace. If the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS have any problems with these premises, let them speak now or forever hold their peace.
[BODY SHUTDOWN=211 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] AUG. 31, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 219/212; FIRST PREMISE
It is an oxymoron to first admit they were "unqualified" to arrive at a diagnosis of an individual's mental health, but to nonetheless then say that the individual had psychiatric problems. In twenty plus years of attempting to obtain relief no one has ever given a reasoned defense of the suspension. Scores of lawyers have had the opportunity to do so; none has. In thousands of discussions with lay persons, no one has ever given a reasoned defense of the suspension; a minuscule few have dug in their heels and in effect said "it just is", no reason, but "it just is". Stonewallers, I trust even you agree that any legal decision predicated upon an oxymoron is invalid! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, I trust even you agree that any legal decision predicated upon an oxymoron is invalid!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=212 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 1, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 220/213; SECOND PREMISE
Enough said about this premise. Even stonewallers should get this message! Even MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS should get this message!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=213 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 2, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 221/214; THIRD PREMISE
[BODY SHUTDOWN=214 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 3, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 222/215; FOURTH PREMISE
"They" have devoted significant amounts of time, energy and resources to make it appear as though I had psychiatric problems, none to facilitate treatment for me for any such problems, and absolutely none to determine whether or not I in fact had any such problem. In minnesota, situs of the original suspension, alcohol and drug treatment programs are as a matter of course made available by the disciplinary body to attorneys claiming alcoholism and addiction as a defense. In minnesota, alcoholism and drug addiction are virtually boiler plate defenses in disciplinary proceedings, most notably in instances when the charges against the individual are supported by OBJECTIVE evidence, in the caught red handed scenarios. I repeat, they expended zero, none, not any time, energy and resources in a way which would lead to a cure of the fictitious phantom illness. Do your life experiences lead you to conclude, as I have, that:
Are not stonewallers truly bad guys! What kind of prism are the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS looking through which lets them see there were "psychiatric problems" to support the suspension??? Are not MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS truly bad guys!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=215 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 4, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 223/216; FIFTH PREMISE
Those of my generation know that master race, uber alles, and euthanasia were virtual mantras of Hitler. Those of my generation know well the price we, indeed the world, paid to repudiate arbitrary elitism. Is not Kosovo a fuss about arbitary elitism? If it is so bad when others do it, why is it not bad when we ourselves do it? And if the requirements for practicing law are, in fact, totally arbitrary in some instances ... Is not what the stonewallers do arbitrary elitism? Why do we so complacently tolerate what the stonewallers do? Is not what the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS do arbitrary elitism??? Why do we so complacently tolerate what the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS do???
[BODY SHUTDOWN=216 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 5, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 224/217; PRAYER Can not the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS answer that prayer with only four words:
[BODY SHUTDOWN=217 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 6, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 225/218; LABOR DAY
[BODY SHUTDOWN=218 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 7, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 226/219; NO MESSAGE
[BODY SHUTDOWN=219 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 8, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 227/220; QUICK READ
The above is an excerpt from the last page of the opinion by which I was suspended from the practice of general law by the state of minnesota. The patent and trademark office rubber stamped the so-called opinion. One lied. The other swore to it. The so-called opinion is unlawful on its face. Should anyone trouble themselves to go beyond that face, they would find that any such "psychiatric" problem issue had been expressly excluded as an issue in the proceedings. The trial/hearing judge (a District Court Judge), had denied a Rule 35 Motion for Mental examination sought by the state. I had not objected to the motion. The only caveat I had put on that issue was that the state pay for an expert witness of my choice, and pay for my time because my practice was very young. The law clearly gave me the right to have my own expert witness present (the tests are very subjective, Rohrshock ink blot and the like). Let's put this mental thing to rest once and for
all. About 5 years prior to the Rule 35 disciplinary proceeding motion
of the above paragraph, as part of divorce proceedings, I had been through
this psychiatric testing drill. I characterize the process as one of each
side getting a hired gun (expert witness) and they go into court and have
a shoot out. We did. My ex's experts said yes he is. Mine said no he isn't.
The judge said nothing. The last is the most significant. That judge issued
a proper decision, one which included findings of fact, and conclusions
of law. He made no direct finding whatsoever relating to the psychiatric
issue. He inferentially did so when he found I was a "fit parent".
THE MAJOR LIES: I. That at the time in question, I had psychiatric problems which rendered me incompetent, or was otherwise incompetent, to represent clients in the state of minnesota. At best, an unproven allegation. In fact, calculated character assasination and business libel. A MAMMOTH LIE. One lied. The other swore to it. II. That if I in fact had psychiatric problems, I would not seek appropriate treatment. The court, and that is taking major liberties with the word, correctly wrote that there was "no evidence that [I] was disposed to submit to psychiatric or other medical treatment." (Literally true, but misleading.) Of course there wasn't any evidence. The matter had been specifically excluded from issue during pre-trial. A MAMMOTH LIE. One lied. The other swore to it. Every proper judicial proceeding of this type should follow the following progression: 1) allege it; 2) prove it; 3) incorporate it into a finding(s) of fact; 4) incorporate it into conclusions of law; and 5) incorporate it into the final order. "They" omitted the first four steps. I defy anyone to compare the so-called opinion to any recognized standard for essential elements in a decision, such as those undoubtedly provided to newly appointed judges. The entire so-called opinion is A MAMMOTH LIE. One lied. The other swore to it. The so-called opinion had to have been written before the trial on the merits, and almost certainly was written before the pre-trial hearing at which the Rule 35 Motion for mental examination was denied. A very calculated, pre-meditated MAMMOTH LIE. One lied. The other swore to it. The so-called opinion includes fifty two denigrations. At best, if one could succeed in comprehending them, and with one possible exception, probably boiler plate assertions that apply to every person who has ever practiced law. In reality, totally unrelated to "instability" or "psychiatric". It is as though they are gratuitous. The exception may be those which relate to my asking two clients to provide me with AFFIDAVITS OF GOOD FAITH. Their official position was that asking the clients to sign a very simple affidavit was intimidation. In reality, an admission that the client could not sign the affidavit without committing perjury. A MONSTROUS PACK OF LIES. One lied. The other swore to it. The oxymoronic language of the suspensions would be comical had it no consequences. The actual consequences are the implementation of a scheme of victimization so massive it is a virtual death sentence. The combination of departure from standard legal procedures, total lack of any objective evidence whatsoever, total absence of reasoning to support the subjective judgments upon which the suspension is based, and total absence of any conduct consistent with empathy for a sick person make it clear that the proceedings had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with carrying out any legal function but instead was solely concerned with carrying out private agendas, agendas violative of the Constitution. Indeed, the agendas of these perpetrators was contemptuous of the Constitution, as contemptuous as contemptuous gets. By their arbitrary action, and the condonation of that arbitrary action implicit in the actions and non-actions of the numerous government and private sector individuals from whom relief from this victimization has been sought evidence a pervasive elitism in this society, and thus a significant element of defacto fascism in this society. Stonewallers, you understand the premises! Stonewallers, you know the suspension is unlawful! Stonewallers, you know that under the Constitution the victim is entitled to relief! Stonewallers, you have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution! Stonewallers, you know you subvert the Constituion when you deny the victim relief! Stonewallers, you know that it is only a question of time until denial of relief to the victim shall result in his death! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you understand the premises!!! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you know the suspension is unlawful!!! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you know that under the Constitution the victim is entitled to relief!!! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution!!! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you know you subvert the Constituion when you deny the victim relief!!! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you know that it is only a question of time until denial of relief to the victim shall result in his death!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=220 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 9, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 228/221; TREASURY
NOTICE ATTENTION: CHERYL FAX#: 202 622 0073 December 22, 1995 The Honorable Robert Rubin The Secretary of the Treasury of the United States 15th. & Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20220 Dear Mr. Secretary: Curiously, there seems to be one item of "old business" which didn't survive the transition from Secretary Bentsen's agenda to yours. Secretary Bentsen's supervisory authority had been invoked in the "PonyTail" matter Briefly, I am widely known as the PonyTail and have been unlawfully suspended from the practices of general law in Minnesota and patent law throughout the United States. I claimed a loss on my income tax return for the unlawful destruction of my law practices. The IRS disallowed the loss and I appealed. IRS counsel verbally agreed in pre-trial conference that the suspensions were unlawful, but refused to so stipulate. It has been a significant number of years since I have filed a tax return. I had A's in my tax courses in law school. Unequivocally, I am entitled to claim a loss for the unlawful destruction of my law practices. The amount of the loss is subjective and can be disputed; the fact of the loss can not. My options have been to sue or settle. Because the liability is so clear cut, my choice has been to seek a settlement. I duly presented the issue to Treasury and systematically moved the issue through channels, ultimately invoking Secretary Bentsen's supervisory authority. Treasury's response has been, without reservation, qualification or condition, to compound the original injury. Treasury has been an instrument of tyranny. The first suspension occurred in 1978. The trials and tribulations since then have been debilitating. Immediate partial reparation is needed to protect my life. Immediate partial reparation shall reduce the government's total liability. One of two things must be done. Either the government cuts me a check for an amount sufficient to meet my expenses until settlement terms can be worked out, or, government must acknowledge its liability and thereby enable me to obtain a loan. An amount of $100,000.00 is needed immediately. This is less than one tenth of one percent of the claim. Accompanying are a document labeled Exhibit "A" from which the unlawfulness of the Minnesota suspension is immediately apparent, a paper titled Void Judicial Decisions which sets forth the controlling law, and a copy of a letter invoking Secretary Bentsen's supervisory authority. The crux of the matter is that Francine Kerner of Treasury verbally made a totally ludicrous disposition of the matter but refused to put it in writing. Francine Kerner reported to Jean Hanson and Ms. Hanson refused to exercise her supervisory authority over Francine Kerner. Jean Hanson reported to Secretary Bentsen. The unlawful suspension consequences have reached life threatening proportions. With Resolve, Keith B. Davis - PonyTail PO Box 476 Fairfax, VA 22030 accmpny: Exh. A; Void; Invoke
[BODY SHUTDOWN=221 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 10, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 229/222; WHITE FLAG
[BODY SHUTDOWN=222 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 11, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 230/223; NO MESSAGE
POSTED SEPT. 12, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 231/224; PRAYER
FOR PEACE
[BODY SHUTDOWN=224 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 13, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 232/225; WHITE
FLAG II Stonewallers, that simple four word sentence would be accepted as a white flag! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, that simple four word sentence would be accepted as a white flag!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=225 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 14, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 233/226; WHITE
FLAG III
[BODY SHUTDOWN=226 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 15, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 234/227; WHITE
FLAG IV
[BODY SHUTDOWN=227 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 16, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 235/228; WHITE
FLAG V
[BODY SHUTDOWN=228 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 17, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 236/229; NONE
SEPT. 18, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 237/230; NONE
SEPT. 19, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 238/231;
15 MINUTES
I pray the stonewallers hear this prayer! I pray the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS hear this prayer!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=231 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 20, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 239/232;
QUICK READ All that is asked of you is your thoughtful consideration of an issue, The PonyTail Hunger Strike for Justice. Over the course of the Strike, so much material has been generated that it must now be a daunting task for newcomers to assimilate the material, particularly because of the newspaper columnist and thematic style of many of the Daily Messages (DMs). That body of material had developed facts which make an unrefutable showing of a denial of justice to the PonyTail, including rights expressly guaranteed to every citizen by the Constitution. The most basic and fundamental of these were summarized as "premises" in the 30 August DM. There are two reasons for characterizing those facts as premises. For those who are open minded and truly interested in making an informed decision about the issue, a statement of premises is logically correct. Secondly, for my adversaries who are only interested in developing whatever spin would best serve their selfish interests, they are thus presented as a direct challenge. By these premises a gauntlet is thrown down. "They" are dared, and the fair minded are invited, to attack them! The premises are all as solid as solid can be; each and every one is as solid as solid can be. The combination of the premises and the Death Sentence Section of the PonyTail Institute for Change (pi4c) website provides a "Quick Read" of what the PonyTail Hunger Strike for Justice is all about. Four of the five premises are exactly as set forth in the 30 August DM. The fifth, premise 3, has been modified only to make it more inclusive; specifically, to include individuals other than the original perpetrators. New readers may be a bit puzzled by the 5th. premise and wonder why it is even included. Admittedly, it is not in any way essential to establishing any of the injustices for which relief is sought. It does, however, contribute significantly to the PonyTail Issue big picture. For now, the emphasis must necessarily be kept on the life threatening hunger strike so suffice it to say that fascism is dealt with at length at the pi4c website, MARQUEE ISSUES, Defacto Fascism. Again, all that is asked is your thoughtful consideration of The PonyTail Hunger Strike for Justice issue.
The patent and trademark office rubber stamped the so-called opinion. One lied. The other swore to it. The so-called opinion is unlawful on its face. Should anyone trouble themselves to go beyond that face, they would find that any such "psychiatric" problem issue had been expressly excluded as an issue in the proceedings. The trial/hearing judge (a District Court Judge), had denied a Rule 35 Motion for Mental examination sought by the state. I had not objected to the motion. The only caveat I had put on that issue was that the state pay for an expert witness of my choice, and pay for my time because my practice was very young. The law clearly gave me the right to have my own expert witness present (the tests are very subjective, Rohrshock ink blot and the like). Let's put this mental thing to rest once and for all. About 5 years prior to the Rule 35 disciplinary proceeding motion of the above paragraph, as part of divorce proceedings, I had been through this psychiatric testing drill. I characterize the process as one of each side getting a hired gun (expert witness) and they go into court and have a shoot out. We did. My ex's experts said yes he is. Mine said no he isn't. The judge said nothing. The last is the most significant. That judge issued a proper decision, one which included findings of fact, and conclusions of law. He made no direct finding whatsoever relating to the psychiatric issue. He inferentially did so when he found I was a "fit parent". THE MAJOR LIES: I. That at the time in question, I had psychiatric problems which rendered me incompetent, or was otherwise incompetent, to represent clients in the state of minnesota. At best, an unproven allegation. In fact, calculated character assassination and business libel. A MAMMOTH LIE. One lied. The other swore to it. II. That if I in fact had psychiatric problems, I would not seek appropriate treatment. The court, and that is taking major liberties with the word, correctly wrote that there was "no evidence that [I] was disposed to submit to psychiatric or other medical treatment." (Literally true, but misleading.) Of course there wasn't any evidence. The matter had been specifically excluded from issue during pre-trial. A MAMMOTH LIE. One lied. The other swore to it. Every proper judicial proceeding of this type should follow the following progression: 1) allege it; 2) prove it; 3) incorporate it into a finding(s) of fact; 4) incorporate it into a conclusion(s) of law; and 5) incorporate it into the final order. "They" omitted the first four steps. I defy anyone to demonstrate that the so-called opinion complies with any recognized standard for essential elements in a decision, such as those undoubtedly provided to newly appointed judges. The entire so-called opinion is A MAMMOTH LIE. One lied. The other swore to it. The so-called opinion had to have been written before the trial on the merits, and almost certainly was written before the pre-trial hearing at which the Rule 35 Motion for mental examination was denied. A very calculated, pre-meditated MAMMOTH LIE. One lied. The other swore to it. The so-called opinion includes fifty two denigrations. At best, if one could succeed in comprehending them, and with one possible exception, probably boiler plate assertions that apply to every person who has ever practiced law. I don't believe any include either a direct or indirect link to "instability" or "psychiatric". It is as though they are gratuitous. The exception may be those which relate to my asking two clients to provide me with AFFIDAVITS OF GOOD FAITH. Their official position was that asking the clients to sign a very simple affidavit was intimidation. In reality, their position was an admission that the client could not sign the affidavit without committing perjury. A MONSTROUS PACK OF LIES. One lied. The other swore to it. The oxymoronic language of the suspensions would be comical had it no consequences. The actual consequences are the implementation of a scheme of victimization so massive it is a virtual death sentence. The combination of departure from standard legal procedures, total lack of any objective evidence whatsoever, total absence of reasoning to support the subjective judgments upon which the suspension is based, and total absence of any conduct consistent with empathy for a sick person (Reference: September 3rd. DM) make it clear that the proceedings had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with carrying out any legal function but instead was solely concerned with carrying out private agendas, agendas violative of the Constitution. Indeed, the agendas of these perpetrators were contemptuous of the Constitution, as contemptuous as contemptuous gets. Their arbitrary action, and the condonation of that arbitrary action implicit in the actions and non-actions of the numerous government and private sector individuals from whom relief from this victimization has been sought, evidence a pervasive arbitrary elitism in this society, and thus evidence a significant element of defacto fascism in this society. The issue started in the state of minnesota, lack of capitalization deliberate, and numerous attempts to obtain relief from various state officials produced no response. The most recent was on June 4, 1999 when standard handout materials were handed directly to governor Jesse Ventura. An agreement was reached at that time with members of his staff to open lines of communication for the purpose of resolving the issue. They reneged on the agreement. Most damning is the behavior of three of the highest offices in this society, Treasury, Justice and the President's Chief of Staff's office. Each of those three offices has engaged in STONEWALLING. The issue was duly and properly worked up through the entire chain of command in each of Treasury and Justice. On December 7, 1993 it was placed directly on the desk of Attorney General Reno by invoking her supervisory authority. I was told by her executive secretariat's office that she personally had reviewed the communication invoking her supervisory authority. There has been no response from Reno. On December 13, 1993 it was placed directly on the desk of then Secretary of Treasury Bentsen. I am 90% certain that I was told by his executive secretariat's office that he personally had reviewed the communication invoking his supervisory authority. There was no response from Bentsen, nor has there been any response from any of Bentsen's successors, and each of those successors has in turn been sent a communication advising them of this unresolved item of "old business" of their predecessor. After numerous efforts to elicit a response from Justice and Treasury fell upon deaf ears, the supervisory authority of President Clinton was invoked by means of a communication to him addressed to his Chief of Staff's (CoS's) office. The non- response-response from the CoS's office was orders of magnitude worse than those of Justice and Treasury. The personnel in the CoS's office were overtly hostile. The issue was a legitimate issue for approximately ten years at various levels in the chain of command. These non-actions, where action is thus unequivocally required, are quintessential stonewalling. Accordingly, stonewalling was made the central theme of the hunger strike, and the following has been addressed to the stonewallers, yea verily, the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS: Stonewallers, you understand the premises! Stonewallers, you know the suspension is unlawful! Stonewallers, you know that under the Constitution the victim is entitled to relief! Stonewallers, you have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution! Stonewallers, you know you subvert the Constitution when you deny the victim relief! Stonewallers, you know that it is only a question of time until denial of relief to the victim shall result in his death! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you understand the premises!!! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you know the suspension is unlawful!!! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you know that under the Constitution the victim is entitled to relief!!! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution!!! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you know you subvert the Constitution when you deny the victim relief!!! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you know that it is only a question of time until denial of relief to the victim shall result in his death!!! All that was asked was your thoughtful consideration of the matter. Just as I knew my adversaries could not possibly successfully attack the premises, I was equally confident that any fair minded person would find the matter a just and worthy cause. And, I am equally confident that anyone finding the matter a just and worthy cause would want to do whatever they could to see that justice is done. Accordingly, for your convenience, contact information is provided below which will allow you to become pro-active on behalf of the cause, a cause which in the larger scheme of things is believed to be of great importance to this society, indeed to be very important to every person on this planet. (Will not the 5th. premise, an integral if not essential element of the cause, ultimately be the final nail in the coffin of fascism on planet earth?) Virtually all of you are familiar with how fast a doubling progression changes a totally insignificant number into a huge number ala the starting with a penny and doubling it every day phenomena. Your pro-active contact of the "bad guys" every day and recruiting two others to do the same thing would absolutely guarantee success for the cause, wouldn't it! While we are on that subject, note that the voice number for the Secretary of Treasury has been changed on the DM boiler plate contact information. When I was double checking the numbers for the QUICK READ Section (at 6:45 a.m. this morning), the Treasury number response was that I had reached "Neil Comstock". I waited until after Treasury had opened and asked an operator for their Executive Secretariat's number. "Edith" gave me the number 202 622 2735. When I called that number, it was answered "Neil Comstock" by an individual who acknowledged I had indeed reached Treasury Executive Secretariat. He confirmed that the Executive Secretariat's office was the highest administrative level in Treasury. I asked him about the old "0064" number, and he said it was also Treasury Executive Secretariat. I also asked him which was the better of the two numbers for reaching the Executive Secretariat's offfice, and he said they were equally good. The number is being changed, however, because I want the number to correspond with the number being given out by Treasury operators. A "fifteen minute appointment" was requested from each of Treasury, Justice and the Chief of Staff's office this morning. A fifteen minute appointment and a yea or nea, stonewallers! A fifteen minute appointment and a yea or nea, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS!!! [BODY SHUTDOWN=232 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] TELE: 651 296 3391 or 800 657 3717 FAX: 651 296 2089 email: jesse.ventura@state.mn.us |
PRESIDENT | ATTORNEY GENERAL | TREASURY SECRETARY |
TELE: 202 456 6797 | TELE: 202 514 2063 | TELE: 202 622 0064 |
FAX: 202 456 1907 | FAX: 202 514 4507 | FAX: 202 622 0073 |
email: president@whitehouse.gov | email: NONE | email: OPCMail@do.treas.gov |
CONTINUE REVIEW | BACK TO MAIN MENU |
SEPT. 21, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 240/233; VOID IN TOTO It is a rule as old as the law that every man is entitled to his day in court, that everyone is entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard, Galpin v Page, 21 LEd 959, 963, 18 Wall 350, Riley v Pearson, 139 NW 361 366, 120 Minn 210, Moore v Smith, 15 SE2d 48, 49, 177 Va 621. A decision of a court without hearing or giving a party an opportunity to be heard on an issue is not a judicial determination of the issue, Windsor v McVeigh, 23 LEd 914, 916, 93 US 274, and is not entitled to respect in any other tribunal, Windsor, supra. at 916, Galpin, supra at 963. In most of the cases involving lack of notice and opportunity to be heard a party was not personally before the court and they typically involve constructive service of process. An exception is a Minnesota case in which two co-defendants were alleged to have conspired. Both defendant's filed motions to dismiss after the evidence against them had been introduced, and the motion of one co-defendant was granted but denied as to the other. Ultimately a decision unfavorable to the remaining defendant was entered. Upon appeal it was held that because one of the two alleged conspirators had been dismissed the decision entered necessarily related to some issue other than the original conspiracy. A fortiori the remaining defendant did not have notice of the actual issue nor an opportunity to defend it, and thus the decision was void, Armstrong v Lyons, 366 F2d 206, 209. The 8th Circuit court of appeals, the circuit which includes the state of Minnesota, has even held that the requirements for notice and an opportunity to be heard are not complied with albeit the issue has been fully litigated before a commissioner if the aggrieved party is denied an opportunity to argue his exceptions to the commissioner's findings before the court to which the findings were submitted, In re Noell, 93 F2d 5,6. In other words, a court can not rubber stamp a commissioner's findings but must afford the aggrieved party an opportunity to be heard re his exceptions to the findings. Actual litigation of the issue per se did not satisfy the due process requirement of an opportunity to be heard. A decision invalid on its face is void, a nullity, and is open to attack or impeachment in any proceeding, direct or collateral, Riley, supra. at 366, Carpenter v Carpenter, 93 SE2d 617, 622, 244 NC 286, and at any time, Carpenter, supra. at 622, Simonds v Norwich, (C.C.A. 8) 73 F2d 412, 415. Indeed, a tribunal is precluded from recognizing a void order of a state court as valid, In re Noell, supra. at 6, Selling v Radford, 37 S Ct 377, 379, 243 US 46, 51. VOID, stonewallers, VOID! VOID, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, VOID!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=233 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 22, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 241/234; EDTs
[BODY SHUTDOWN=234 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 23, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 242/235; PETITION FOR REDRESS
[BODY SHUTDOWN=235 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 24, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 243/236; 1ST AMENDMENT DENIAL
MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, according to the conspiracy laws, you are a party to this denial of my first amendment rights!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=236 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 25, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 244/237; NO HELP
[BODY SHUTDOWN=237 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 26, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 245/238; PRAYER
[BODY SHUTDOWN=238 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 27, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 246/239; MORATORIUM DECLARATON
That proposed solution of the issue is my perception of the most amicable resolution possible. Perhaps they are limiting their perception to one which I know full well exists within the coterie of the arbitrary elitists; namely, that the only view that exists, is their officially approved view. If that is the case, they are even more irresponsible than even I thought them to be, for I know, and they know, for an absolute fact that a significant number throughout the world totally reject their arbitrary "officially approved" view and consider that view as a contemptuous disregard of the principles of democracy. Perhaps and if. They shall be given until midnight September 29th., through September 29th. and to September 30th. to schedule such an appointment. If, stonewallers, you believe, or pretend to believe you are not damaging this society, you are bigger fools than even I believed! If, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you believe, or pretend to believe you are not damaging this society, you are bigger fools than even I believed!!! That having been said, in an effort to minimize the damage which the totally unjustified perpetuation of this issue by the stonewallers is causing this society, a moratorium is unilaterally declared through September 29th. and to September 30th, until midnight September 29th! That having been said, in an effort to minimize the damage which the totally unjustified perpetuation of this issue by the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS is causing this society, a moratorium is unilaterally declared through September 29th. and to September 30th, until midnight September 29th!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=239 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 28, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 247/240; MORATORIUM DAY 2
[BODY SHUTDOWN=240 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 29, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 248/241; MORATORIUM 3RD DAY
[BODY SHUTDOWN=241 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] SEPT. 30, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 249/242; ELECTIVE PROCESS DEMOCRACY
There has been no official response. More stonewalling. ELECTIVE process democracy certainly produces stonewalling! ELECTIVE process democracy certainly produces MURDEROUS STONEWALLING!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=242 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] OCT. 4, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 253/246; LAST EDITION
[BODY SHUTDOWN=246 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] OCT. 5, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 254/247; ONE
[BODY SHUTDOWN=247 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] OCT. 6, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 255/248; HOPE
[BODY SHUTDOWN=248 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] OCT. 8, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 257/250; CIVICS
MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, even citizens have duties!!! Stonewallers, you have specific duties which flow from the oath you took to uphold the Constitution! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you have specific duties which flow from the oath you took to uphold the Constitution!!! Stonewallers, did you even take a course in civics? MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, did you even take a course in civics??? At a minimum Stonewallers, you need to take a refresher course in civics! At a minimum MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you need to take a refresher course in civics!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=250 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] OCT. 18, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 267/260; INJURY TIME OUT
[BODY SHUTDOWN=260 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] OCT. 25, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 274/267; CRISIS
[BODY SHUTDOWN=267 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] NOV. 20, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 300/293; DAY 300
[MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=64] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] NOV. 22, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 302/295; DESIGNER HUNGER STRIKE
[MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=62] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] NOV. 23, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 303/296; A FEW MILLION GOOD GENERALS
[MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=61] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] NOV. 24, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 304/297; CRESCENDO
is to build, and build, and build this cause until the "elected" representatives hear the voice of the citizentry loud and clear, to build it to a crescendo which they can not ignore! The significant developments referred to in the DMs of the last few days have been towards facilitating that end. Setting a final date for the strike's logical conclusion, absent the stonewallers doing what they have an absolute obligation to do and which they should have done long, long ago, the heretofore unspoken "d" word, death, creates a sense of urgency. Yesterday's hint re another significant development was inclusion of three additional pi4c website links. Actually, I have added many additional sites. There are now approximately twenty (20) pi4c websites up and running with another half dozen or so in partial stages of completion. Many of the new sites have message boards, so that of course is a natural way to announce the arrival of pi4c at the site and otherwise promote the cause. A number of the new "hosts" allow the pi4c page to have its own message board which offers a further mechanism for promoting the cause. A complete list of pi4c sites is provided below. Those which have their own message boards include the characters "mb" following the URL/LINK: Please turn your imagination loose and share with the rest of us any imaginative ideas you come up with for using the new sites to promote the cause either or both by posting the ideas on the pi4c message board and private email to pi4c via the following mail link: pi4c STRATEGIES Netizens, a crescendo for the stonewallers! Netizens, a crescendo for the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS!!!
[MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=60] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] NOV. 27, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 307/300; SABOTAGE
The words in caps were lower case in the actual message of course but have been switched to uppercase to make the "mistake" stand out. Replace them with a period and the paragraph makes sense. His staff and I did shake hands on it. And, they have reneged on the agreement. There is no way I would overlook a mistake as gross as that. Why report this one? Because it is particularly "tangible". For one thing, it is a signature activity of one of the BAD GUYS, bad guys in caps to denote that the particular individual who is the named bad guy (Ventura) is actually only an icon for the larger anonymous group, in this case, at a minimum, the minnesota establishment, and more likely than not the generic "establishment", i.e., those responsible for the original unlawful suspension. The signature activity is to trash my work product, especially in a way which creates the appearance of incompetence. Somewhere I have one or more writings which recount my being told, years in advance of any formal overt acts against me, "a mistake on every page" in a context which made the comment a threat by a person who fits the establishment profile. Why make a federal case out of this? It is their signature. It happens over, and over, and over again. This signature is the heart and guts of their attempt to kill me. Their thusly contrived perception of incompetence is the boot heel on the back of my neck designed, calculated and intended to prevent me from securing resources which would allow me to fight back in a meaningful way. It is this conduct which has been referred to numerous times as their strategy of keeping me "barefoot and pregnant". I am certain that over the years the signature issue alone has needlessly consumed more than 1000 hours of my time. It is an example of what I mean when I say that this matter was killing me anyway ala the drops of water on granite of the June 15th. DM. Netizens, all I can say is thank the Lord God Almighty for the internet!!!!! Also note that the contact information for bad guy Ventura now also includes an 800 number and he can also provide a "lightswitch" remedy of the problem, see DMs [switched to another screen to obtain dates of lightswitch DMs]
Lightswitch in essence means instantaneous. By contrast, I fully expect negotiations of a final settlement of the issue to take as long as a year to complete. Lightswitch has been regularly used in connection with the simple, four word declaratory sentence: Given that sentence, adequate funds to insure successful negotiation of a final settlement should be virtually instantaneously obtainable. Stonewallers, it is unconscionable to withhold that sentence! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, it is unconscionable to withhold that sentence!!! Stonewallers, enough sabotage already! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, enough sabotage already!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=2301DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=57] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] NOV. 30, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 310/303;
Now Reform Party is your term, your name and it can mean any thing you want it to mean. The expressions "Our word is good" and "We respect all people as equal human beings" are in the larger sense of their meaning not your expressions, those expressions have definite meanings in this society and, indeed, the latter has been unequivocally and irrevocably defined in this society by numerous instances of mortal combat the very purposes of which were to establish and protect the generally understood meaning of the term, albeit that meaning has admittedly changed over the centuries (a change which has always been towards being more inclusive). As has been made clear in numerous DMs, the most recent being the DM of Nov. 27th., the actions, and non-actions, of Jesse Ventura relative to the PonyTail issue are totally inconsistent with the true meaning of the expressions "Our word is good" and "We respect all people as equal human beings". Need it be added, life threateningly inconsistent? What say you Reform Party National Chairman Russell Verney, and minnesota state chairman Rick McCluhan? Netizens, you can let messrs Verney and McCluhan know what you say: Verney and McCluhan And netizens, also note the addition of an 800 number in the contact information for Governor Ventura, to wit: 800 657 3717. What say you Reform Party National Chairman Russell Verney, and minnesota state chairman Rick McCluhan to stonewalling? What say you Reform Party National Chairman Russell Verney, and minnesota state chairman Rick McCluhan to MURDEROUS STONEWALLING???
[BODY SHUTDOWN=303 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=56] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 1, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 311/304; ASSISTANCE
[BODY SHUTDOWN=304 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=55] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 2, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 312/305; STRESS KILLS III
[BODY SHUTDOWN=305 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=54] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 3, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 313/306; DECISIONS, DECISIONS
[BODY SHUTDOWN=306 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=53] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 4, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 314/307; OXYMORON
[BODY SHUTDOWN=307 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=52] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 6, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 316/309; EASY
And the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS are of this ilk also, aren't they!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=309 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=50] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 7, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 317/310; JANET RENO
[BODY SHUTDOWN=310 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=49] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 8, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 318/311; pi4c Public Service n
The Nov. 30th. DM was sent to all of the Reform Party National officers and to 100% of the Reform Party state chairpersons. There have been three responses. One apparently by a state chairman elect who seemed genuinely concerned and discussed the matter at length. One who asked only whether the email had been DELIBERATELY sent to her (emphasis added), who obviously was concerned only with whether or not she could yell spam. And, the third asked to be removed from the list. You be the judge, the facts are: a) Ventura is a reform party candidate; b) Ventura was contacted numerous times, including numerous times "pre-inauguration", re relief as simple as the four word sentence "The suspension is unlawful."; c) Ventura has provided no relief whatsoever; d) Ventura's staff agreed, shook hands on an agreement, to open lines of communication; e) they have reneged, without even so much as an explanation, on the agreement to open lines of communication; f) The Minnesota Reform Party statement of principles includes the sentence "Our word is good and we are accountable for the promises we make."; and, g) as we enter the eighth day after calling this to the attention of the entire Reform Party leadership, the sole responses by the reform party are the three set forth above. Again, you be the judge! Actions speak louder than words, don't they. And sometimes non action, stonewalling, sends the loudest, most clamorous message of all, doesn't it. Newcomers, for the true significance of this DM, for the "big picture" you are invited to read the MARQUEE ISSUES Section, "Lottery/Draft" Sub Section. And netizens if you are in a mood to express your views to either or both the Reform Party national chair Verney and minnesota state chair McCluhan, for your convenience: Verney and McCluhan Another truth about the elective process, another public service provided for you by pi4c. Justice, stonewallers, justice! Justice MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, justice!!! All that is sought stonewallers is justice! All that is sought MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS is justice!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=311 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=48] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 9, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 319/312; RENEGE
A MURDEROUS STONEWALLING cur!!! *The Jun. 4 DM details an agreement made with his staff.
[BODY SHUTDOWN=312 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=47] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 10, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 320/313; ADDRESS
[BODY SHUTDOWN=313 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=46] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 13, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 323/316; CONSTITUTION - HIERARCHY
Let's see, that makes three matters from the absolute highest level of the hierarchy, Constitutional matters, which are being totally ignored. I'm sort of getting an idea of what the PonyTail means by the assertion: DE FACTO FASCISM - MATTERS INCONSISTENT WITH THAT AGENDA DON'T HAPPEN. Now, if you were to find that much lesser laws, rules and regulations were routinely enforced, and they served to injure the PonyTail, then we would have the corollary of the above: DE FACTO FASCISM - MATTERS CONSISTENT WITH THAT AGENDA DO HAPPEN. Suffice it to say that government tyranny courtesy of "by color of law" has been relentless, absolutely for more than twenty years and arguably for forty plus years. Stonewallers, dispositioning the issue put on your desks by the PonyTail is INCONSISTENT WITH THE FASCIST AGENDA, isn't it! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, dispositioning the issue put on your desks by the PonyTail is INCONSISTENT WITH THE FASCIST AGENDA, isn't it!!! Stonewallers, stonewalling on the issue put on your desks by the PonyTail is CONSISTENT WITH THE FASCIST AGENDA, isn't it! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, stonewalling on the issue put on your desks by the PonyTail is CONSISTENT WITH THE FASCIST AGENDA, isn't it!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=316 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=43] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 14, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 324/317; LAWRENCE SUMMERS
[BODY SHUTDOWN=317 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=42] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 17, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 327/320; ASSISTANCE PLEASE
Sleep is my greatest need - I've only had about an hour of sleep in the last 30 plus hours so this shall be very brief. Must announce, however, that arrangements have been completed for implementation of a very limited internet fund raising activity - only $3000.00 dollars of operating capital for pi4c is being sought. It was implemented at only the six following sites:
Your assistance please. Stonewallers, I may just be able to cut into your unfair advantage! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, I may just be able to cut into your unfair advantage!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=320 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=39] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 20, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 330/323; William Jefferson Clinton
In plain english, the president was told there were two cabinet members who were not doing their jobs, that the matter was life threatening, would he please get the matter straightened out. That was on December 19, 1995 by means of a communication to the president's chief of staff's office.
[BODY SHUTDOWN=323 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=36] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 21, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 331/324; JUSTICE I
Justice, stonewallers, justice! Justice, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, justice! [DAY 331/324; BOILER PLATE] [BODY SHUTDOWN=324 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=35] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 22, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 332/325; JUSTICE II
Familiar words, aren't they. If there is oxymoronic justice for one, does this mean there shall be oxymoronic justice for all? Stonewallers, you have created a standard of oxymoronic justice for all! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you have created a standard of oxymoronic justice for all!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=325 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=34] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 23, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 333/326; JUSTICE III
Stonewallers, we know the choice if the matter is left in your hands! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, we know the choice if the matter is left in your hands!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=326 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=33] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DAILY MESSAGES FOR DEC. 27TH. & 30TH. DEC. 27, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 337/330; JUSTICE IV
For our hypothetical assume that impeachment proceedings are instituted against the highest elected officer of a sovereignty. Pre-trial proceedings sought to interrogate the officer about his allegiance to an adversary foreign country because of a visit he made to that country while he was in college. Specific charges include sexual harrassment of an aid. In a proceeding analogous to a pre-trial motion, it is ruled, without explanation, that the allegiance to an adversary foreign country issue would not be pursued. Our hypothetical further assumes that a formal hearing was held on the sexual harrassment charge which produced the following opinion by the hearing tribunal:
Mind you now, they say nothing whatsoever about remedying any other behavior. Stonewallers, is this truly the kind of justice you embrace? MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, is this truly the kind of justice you embrace??? Stonewallers, we know this is the justice you embrace when it is convenient for you to do so! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, we know this is the justice you embrace when it is convenient for you to do so!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=330 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=29] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 30, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 340/333; STATUS
Yes, they wrongfully suspended my access to the internet on Monday. Time, energy and resources, TERs folks, TERs. How many times have I written about TERs. And how much simpler a concept can there be? Conclusive of malice, isn't it. I was partially back on by mid-evening Monday, but not totally back until mid afternoon today, Thursday December 30th. Let's see now, on Monday there were approximately 30 days left within which to resolve this matter and escape death, weren't there. And, from Monday until now is about 3 days, isn't it. They helped themselves to 10%, or greater, of the remainder of my life unless the matter is successfully resolved, didn't they. How much of my life had you already helped yourself to, Stonewallers! How much of my life had you already helped yourself to, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=333 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=26] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 3, 2000 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 344/337; EVIL I
Malignant evil. An evil which if not corrected shall destroy this society, and perhaps destroy this planet. Stonewallers, suffice it to say for today that you epitomize that evil! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, suffice it to say for today that you epitomize that evil!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=337 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=24] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 4, 2000 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 345/338; EVIL II
Would anyone deny that the threat of terrorism from without is without parallel, both qualitatively and quantitatively? Would anyone deny that those dissatisfied within see the evil of the stonewallers as justification for their dissatisfaction? Would anyone deny that terrorists without see the evil of the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS as justification for their agendas? Would anyone deny that the evil of the stonewallers feeds both dissatisfaction within and the threat of terrorism from without!!! Would anyone deny that the evil of the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS feeds both dissatisfaction within and the threat of terrorism from without!!! I trust everyone agrees that the messenger is not the problem. Stonewallers, even non-action can have a ripple effect! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS even non-action can have a ripple effect!!! Stonewallers, the evil of oxymoronic justice fosters dissatisfaction within! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, the evil of oxymoronic justice fosters dissatisfaction within!!! Stonewallers, the evil of oxymoronic justice fosters terrorism from without! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, the evil of oxymoronic justice fosters terrorism from without!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=338 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=24] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 5, 2000 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 346/339; EVIL III
That out is denial. Some of the stonewallers, the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS are incorrigible. Others may be doing, actually not doing, what they are not doing because of the psychological phenomena of denial.
I trust we all agree that the question of whether or not one is in denial is quintessentially self determinable when the underlying issue is an oxymoron! Let me rephrase the object of this DM, it is to take away from the INCORRIGIBLE stonewallers, INCORRIGIBLE MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS the out of denial, and to make those stonewallers, those MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS who are in fact in denial aware of their self-awareness deficit that they might act to undo the wrong they have done. Stonewallers you have an absolute duty to determine whether or not your lack of response to a petition for the redress of oxymoronic justice is a result of psychological denial! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS you have an absolute duty to determine whether or not your lack of response to a petition for the redress of oxymoronic justice is a result of psychological denial!!! Stonewallers, you and you alone, have the responsibility to determine whether or not your lack of response to a petition for the redress of oxymoronic justice is a result of psychological denial! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you and you alone, have the responsibility to determine whether or not your lack of response to a petition for the redress of oxymoronic justice is a result of psychological denial!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=337 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=20] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 6, 2000 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 347/340; EVIL IV
Your embrace of evil oxymoron justice, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, is the embrace of a praying mantice, the embrace of a black widow spider!!! And worst of all, stonewallers, your penchant for evil oxymoron justice only serves to turn WWII into a fuss between their fascists and our fascists! And worst of all, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, your penchant for evil oxymoron justice only serves to turn WWII into a fuss between their fascists and our fascists!!! Such is the legacy of evil oxymoron justice, stonewallers! Such is the legacy of evil oxymoron justice, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=340 DAYS [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=19] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 7, 2000 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 348/341; EVIL V
By presenting to them in the Wednesday DM the psychological phenomena of denial, an out was offered to them. Do you not agree that if they were in denial but still did not respond once they became aware of it, their lack of response epitomizes the evil of which it is complained. Would it not be evil per se to not even determine whether or not they were in denial. I rest my case. By any standard stonewallers you are incorrigible! By any standard MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS you are incorrigible!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=341 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=18] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 8, 2000 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 349/342; EVIL VI
Seems like there was another fellow around here saying he was not a crook. Remember distinctly a former attorney general categorically denying his guilt. Maybe it's something in the water. Then again, maybe it has something to do with the elective process.
You are what you are stonewallers! You are what you are MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=342 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=17] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 10, 2000 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 351/344; SPIN
How do you recognize spin:
Inside the beltway is the expression used here for DC and the areas in Maryland and Virginia inside the ring around DC formed by the 495 freeway. Basically, the area within which the politicos reside. Generally speaking, the operative word of the definition is "special". Trust me folks, you wouldn't believe how "special" a point of view can get in this neck of the woods. Recently after hitting tennis balls late one Sunday afternoon after a skins football game as my hitting partner, whom I had never met before and who was even more recent to the area than I, as he and I made small talk as we walked from the tennis courts he mentioned how expensive it was to live in the area. I agreed and added simply that the area was interesting but different. I said if you bought a hot dog in the area you would get more spin on it than mustard and relish. He laughed. Then he agreed with me. You get used to the spin. Sort of. Like everything else, some are very good at it; others terrible. In the most severe cases, spin becomes whatever they need to justify whatever they want to do. No matter how totally nonsensical something is, if they have said that is the way it is, then that is the way it is. They are what I call the "by definition" bunch. And that folks is how you get oxymoronic justice. It is how you get MURDEROUS OXYMORONIC JUSTICE! Stonewallers, you aid, abet, and enforce a death sentence created by, oxymoronic justice! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you aid, abet, and enforce a death sentence created by, oxymoronic justice!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=344 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=15] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] STARVATION DAYS 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, & 14 DAILY MESSAGES JAN. 12, 2000 HUNGER/STARVATION STRIKE DAY 353/346; From this day forward, until conclusion of the Strike one way or the other, only fluids shall be consumed. January 25th., the anniversary date of commencement of the Strike, shall continue to be the last possible day of the Strike, the strike shall be manipulated so that it is impossible for the Strike to continue beyond January 25th. Stonewallers in particular note that STARVATION DAY 1 was preceded by 352 hunger strike days! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS in particular note that STARVATION DAY 1 was preceded by 352 hunger strike days!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=346 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=13] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 13, 2000 HUNGER/STARVATION STRIKE DAY 354/347; MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, if I don't make it, it's murder you
know!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=347 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=12] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 14, 2000 STARVATION/HUNGER STRIKE DAY 355/348; DOMINOS Take that stonewallers, I've sicked Domino's on you! Take that MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, I've sicked Domino's on you!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=348 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=11] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 15, 2000 STARVATION/HUNGER STRIKE DAY 356/349; STARVATION
DAY 4/? I do not want harm to come to any innocent person, but I will not tolerate any interference with the STARVATION/HUNGER strike. To interfere is to aid and abet those against whom the STARVATION/HUNGER is directed, the arbitrary elitist fascists. Would you not agree that sending the email increases my risk? It is my expression of "good faith". Would it not be good faith on the part of any law officer called upon to intervene in the STARVATION/HUNGER strike to refuse to do so. The emails and this DM gives every law enforcement person an opportunity to inform themselves of the facts. Armed with the facts they can say that they know of their own personal knowledge that the suspension is unlawful because based on an OXYMORON. The email sent to the Sheriff and Chief of Police (and otherwise circulated, I might add) follows:
Law enforcement officials in particular know how difficult access to the true cause of an evil can be. In their case, they often grant immunity to "relative innocents" in order to gain access to the true cause of the evil, the higher ups, boss, gang leader, whatever. Stonewallers, you put innocent people at risk! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you put innocent people at risk!!! Worse yet stonewallers, as you full well know, you have deliberately sought to provoke me to violence! Worse yet, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, as you full well know, you have deliberately sought to provoke me to violence!!! Stonewallers, had I resorted to violence I would have become the bad guy instead of you, wouldn't I! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, had I resorted to violence I would have become the bad guy instead of you, wouldn't I!!! Stonewallers, is it any wonder prayers to protect the innocent are sought this sabbath weekend! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, is it any wonder prayers to protect the innocent are sought this sabbath weekend!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=349 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=10] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 17, 2000 STARVATION/HUNGER STRIKE DAY 358/351; STARVATION
DAY 6/? - FOCUS Typically aren't world class conflicts started by the elite and borne by the common person! Does not the risk to innocents disclosed in the weekend sabbath DM dramatically illustrate that same inequity! In this case it is that elusive "they", the "those who are in control" who endanger innocents. Without the stonewallers, they could not do so! Without the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, they could not do so!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=351 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=8] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 18, 2000 STARVATION STRIKE DAY 359/352; STARVATION DAY
7/? - This notwithstanding I have been told "You could be president." on several separate occasions by apparently sincere, credible appearing persons. I do not want to be president. I do want to work on a Constitutional amendment. (Full Website, Marquee Issues, Lottery/Draft) I know absolutely nothing about the particulars of the federal law which makes it a crime to kill a presidential candidate. Stonewallers, I find it absolutely hilarious that a single write in vote might have the potential of bringing you down under that law! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, I find it absolutely hilarious that a single write in vote might have the potential of bringing you down under that law!!! It would be poetic justice, stonewallers! It would be poetic justice, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS!!! Better poetic justice than oxymoronic justice, stonewallers! Better poetic justice than oxymoronic justice, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS!!! Stonewallers, intellectually I've always known it would be worth it; now I even feel it would be worth it! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, intellectually I've always known it would be worth it; now I even feel it would be worth it!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=352 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=7] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 20, 2000 STARVATION/HUNGER STRIKE DAY 361/354; STARVATION
DAY 9/? - MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, let there be no "mistake", there is no guarantee the STARVATION/HUNGER strike shall last until its first anniversary on January 25, 2000!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=354 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=5] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 21, 2000 STARVATION/HUNGER STRIKE DAY 362/355; It was certainly important to our forefathers, witness the "speedy trial" proviso in the 6th. Amendment. (Applies to criminal trials; the underlying issue in law is deemed quasi criminal.) While we're on the 6th. Amendment, let's not forget that it gives the accused the right to "be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation". The closest we get to that is a pre-trial Motion for mental examination, basically what is known as "a fishing expedition". And, the motion was denied. Worse yet, the 6th. Amendment is supposed to guarantee the accused the right to be "confronted by" the witnesses against him. Who is it that is accusing him, and exactly and precisely what is their accusation. That can't happen when the matter is actually withdrawn from issue, pre-trial, can it. And then there's the 5th. Amendment ... Let's see now, they've completely trashed the 1st. Amendment right to petition for redress of grievances, a petition to correct trashing of the 6th. Amendment, trashing of the 5th. Amendment, and trashing of ... and trashing of ... and trashing of ... Justice delayed is justice denied. Relief from oxymoronic justice has been denied for 25 plus years stonewallers! Relief from oxymoronic justice has been denied for 25 plus years MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS!!! Stonewallers, justice delayed is justice denied! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, justice delayed is justice denied!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=355 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=4] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 22, 2000 STARVATION/HUNGER STRIKE DAY 363/356; STARVATION
DAY 11/? - OPEN - SECRET The DMs for the 24th. and 25th. have been completed; there are six DM's in some stage of completion in the que, that leaves only today and a sabbath DM. Those in the que, while informative, just were not right for the occasion. Reflection upon my review of the Constitution yesterday though gave me an idea I was comfortable with. Is not the essence of the stonewalling in this case secrecy? If it isn't known, it is secret. Has there been a secret trial? There hasn't been a public one. Are they saying, yes we know the stated basis is oxymoronic and of course that isn't the real reason but surely you know we have this secret reason we can't tell you about? The Constitution really isn't all that long, and I speed read almost all of it yesterday. An overwhelming impression was that our forefathers said be done with what amounts to the secrecy of tyrannical government, we must have an open government, a public government in order that all know clearly and unequivocally what is going on. Open. Not secret, but open. All those references to freedom. Freedom is openness. Is that not what our forefathers had in mind. We frequently here references to our "open" society, don't we. What is your secret reason, stonewallers? What is your secret reason, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS??? Our forefathers must be turning over in their graves, stonewallers! Our forefathers must be turning over in their graves, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=356 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=3] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 23, 2000 STARVATION/HUNGER STRIKE DAY 364/357; STARVATION
DAY 12/? - RECONCILIATION
This sabbath weekend I pray for reconciliation with my family. This sabbath weekend I offer the following towards reconciliation of the society as a whole: Do you feel sorry for yourself? If so, why? Identification of the problem will let you solve the problem.
Angry, resentful towards the PonyTail? The PonyTail is only the messenger, you're actually angry and resentful at the problem the message puts on your doorstep. Did not the stonewallers actually put the message on your doorstep. It would not be there were it not for the stonewallers! Did not the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS actually put the message on your doorstep. It would not be there were it not for the MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS!!! Justice for the PonyTail would be reconciliation for all, stonewallers! Justice for the PonyTail would be reconciliation for all, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=357 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=2] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 24, 2000 STARVATION/HUNGER STRIKE DAY 365/358; STARVATION
DAY 13/? - 11TH HOUR EVE That makes today the 11th. hour eve, doesn't it. It is also the 365th. day of the PonyTail Hunger Strike for Justice, one full year. A full year of simply trying to make the government of this society conduct its business consistent with the Constitution. It hasn't done that. It has continued to conduct its business consistent with the fascist agenda. Unless you fulfill the obligation to uphlold the Constitution imposed by your oaths of office stonewallers, tomorrow you shall become murderers! Unless you fulfill the obligation to uphlold the Constitution imposed by your oaths of office MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, tomorrow you shall become murderers!!! The odds are that you won't have until the 11th. hour, stonewallers! The odds are that you won't have until the 11th. hour, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=358 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=2] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] JAN. 25, 2000 STARVATION/HUNGER STRIKE DAY 366/359; STARVATION
DAY 14/? - TRUTH Why did you deny that truth, stonewallers? Why did you deny that truth, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS???
[BODY SHUTDOWN=359 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=LESS THAN ONE] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] TELE: 651 296 3391 or 800 657 3717 FAX: 651 296 2089 email: jesse.ventura@state.mn.us |
PRESIDENT | ATTORNEY GENERAL | TREASURY SECRETARY |
TELE: 202 456 6797 | TELE: 202 514 2063 | TELE: 202 622 2735 |
FAX: 202 456 1907 | FAX: 202 514 4507 | FAX: 202 622 0073 |
email: president@whitehouse.gov | email: NONE | email: OPCMail@do.treas.gov |
MISSION STATEMENT DEATH SENTENCE EXECUTION
This is a work in progress. There shall be more as time and energy permits. © 1999 PonyTail Institute for Change |
(FORMERLY SELECTION) |
||
It is proposed that the Constitution be amended to provide that our current "election" method of selecting our "representatives" be replaced with a lottery/draft method of selection. |
For the time being, the Marquee Issue page for the LOTTERY/DRAFT issue shall consist of a collection of the excerpts from Daily Messages which refer to the issue. FEBRUARY 1, 1999 Select our representatives by drafting them. Establish a pool of qualified candidates and select representatives by drafting them. I have been advocating this theory for some time, on some occasions using a lottery selection metaphor. (I have increasingly become enamored with the notion of a society walking up to an individual and saying, ok buster/busterette, get your affairs in order, you are going into training and you may be spending the next 4, 6, 8 years doing something else. I really like the notion of that. A lot.) MARCH 19, 1999 Those who have followed the issue closely will know the sentiments resonate with me and perhaps even recall comments about the need for a Constitutional Amendment which would address this issue specifically. For those joining the Daily Message thread mid-stream, the Daily Message for February 1, 1999 proposes replacing the "elective" process for selecting public officials with a draft or lottery selection process as a mechanism for eliminating the sytem which allows powerful interests to control a supposedly democratic society. APRIL 26, 1999 BEST RECEIVED CONCEPT: replacement of the elective system with a lottery/draft selection system; JUNE 29, 1999 And, the crown jewel of the que'd messages: The solution to the fascist element inherent in any "election selection process" form of democratic government is to replace elections with a lottery/draft selection process from a pool of qualified candidates so large that it can not be compromised. The thing that really tickles my funny bone, is the likelihood that Russia would become Democratic before the United States. I can not see ourselves changing our beloved Constitution that radically in anything less than 10 years. All "emerging" democracies, including Russia, can draft a Constitution with a lottery/draft selection process in a heartbeat. Would not the greatest benefit from a lottery/draft selection process be in the dregs, the residue left over? Let's say that the pool size for president is one thousand (1000). Instead of pouring campaign funds down a rat hole, significantly less funds would be used to train candidates and afterwards we would have 999 statesmen left over. Over a period of time, would that not create a very sophisticated society!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MARCH 9, 1999 [money as] a virtual condition of access to the bureauacrcy. MAY 5, 1999 The poor do not have access to government. ... The politically incorrect do not have access to government. ... The elite have access to government. We know [arbitrary] elitism is fascism. MAY 9, 1999 ELECTED politicians act[ing] not on the merit of matters, but rather on that which ensures their political survival. MAY 9, 1999 The privilege we have referred to almost exclusively is that of "ACCESS" to government, and our complaint is really not that they [the "elite"] have access, but rather that in reality they have it exclusively. JULY 19, 1999 A specific charge has been levied in the DMs that our democratic process is seriously flawed because it reserves virtually exclusive access to government to the elite (some using it judiciously, others not). ... At least one member of mainstream media recently, and icily I might add, referred to his being a member of the elite who "had access to government". AUG. 1, 1999 We still have campaign finance problems. AUG. 1, 1999 We still have pols devoting virtually all their time, energy and resources to their own political preservation.
[BODY SHUTDOWN=187 DAYS] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] |
Or the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE ... and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. First Amendment. Uno number one. And, the right to petition, is a right of the people. A right of the people. And, the Declaration of Independence itself tells us what petitioning for redress of grievances meant to the founding fathers:
It is within such a context that the response has repeatedly been stonewalling! It is within such a context that the response has repeatedly been MURDEROUS STONEWALLING!!! |
de facto: |
in reality (Webster's New Collegiate) |
fascism: |
arbitrary elitism (PonyTail) |
Numerous references have been made in the Daily Messages to fascism, both as inherent in every society which has an "elective process" democratic form of government, and to the comparatively recent phenomena of world facism. Virtually every society is politically goulash, a little of this, a little of that, and a lot of something. My concern is the degree to which we are politically a de facto fascist society. Without reservation, qualification, or condition, the one thing this society is not, is a merit society. Merit is the exception in this society. By definition, any society in which the circumstance of birth predominantly determines the quality of life of the individual is not a merit society. Would anyone dispute that far and away the majority of those born into poverty in this society die in poverty? Again we are talking about a matter of degree so, of course, to some degree every society is a merit society but this time the concern is the lack rather than the excess of the degree. Is not merit an exact opposite of arbitrary? Would anyone argue that get along, go along is not merit? Would anyone argue that Political Correctness (PC) is not merit? Would anyone argue that get along, go along and PC have been the behavior of choice during at least the past several decades? Is not the PonyTail case proof positive of the degree of intolerance in this society for one who rejects get along, go along and political correctness? Is not stonewalling the epitome of arbitrariness! Is not MURDEROUS STONEWALLING the epitome of arbitrariness!!! Many other facets of the fascism issue are addressed in the following DMs: FEBRUARY 2, FEBRUARY 26, MARCH 1 & 2, MARCH 9, MARCH 15, MARCH 26, APRIL 14, APRIL 20, APRIL 24, MAY 5, MAY 6, MAY 17, MAY 19, JUNE 7, JUNE 9, JUNE 19, JUNE 21, JUNE 26, JUNE 29, JULY 1, JULY 3, JULY 12, JULY 15, JULY 19, and JULY 31. As time and energy permits, those facets shall be consolidated on this page. |
For the moment at least, this tribute shall consist of the Daily Message for July 23, 1999. |
The site is limited today to a single Daily Message prepared in the spirit of a tribute to John F Kennedy Jr., Carolyn Bessette Kennedy, and Lauren Bessette. This is directed in particular to those who are either younger or of the same generation as JFK Jr. and the Bessette sisters because I would expect your grief is the most intense of all of those who mourn their loss. Those of us who are older have emotional callouses from the losses of President Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and Robert Kennedy, to mention a few, and are better able I would expect to absorb this loss. Similarly, we are most likely better prepared because of a personal loss, or, indeed, personal losses, ... Let me first say that the loss of President Kennedy was unbelievably mind numbing for me, and that the prospect of the loss which has now become a reality brought back those same exact feelings. I simply am better able to cope with them now. Do we not feel these losses so keenly because of a love for those with whom we will no longer share life, is it not a loss of those shared experiences which added so richly to our lives which intensifies the grief? An icon salute comes to mind. For those of you with faith, you know absolutely that in the grander scheme of things, passing in reality should be our objective, for it is our reward, indeed, the ultimate reward. Are we not very imperfect in our faith that we can not celebrate and rejoice on these occasions? It would not surprise me at all if at the moment your faith is challenged. It will not at all surprise me if you of their generation do not receive from them a true gift of love, the deepening of your faith. And that would make the love reciprocal, wouldn't it. And one of my personal losses which forced me to think this through very thoroughly, it was one of the dearest, sweetest persons to have ever walked the surface of this planet, my sister in law. She was spared the tawdriness of life on this planet which we of a lesser God have to bear, at an age significantly less than 30. |
During the ballpark first 100 days of the Hunger-Strike (protein starvation phase, liquid intake only), it was relatively easy to control the caloric intake. Suffice it to say that adding protein also added solids which made it much more difficult to precisely control. On June 16, keeping a diary was resumed for the express purpose of gaining greater control over the caloric shortfall. Exercise was added on July 5th. partly for the purpose of providing a greater degree of control over caloric intake, but also for the specific purpose of strengthening the cardio vascular system. As the exercise became more rigorous the intake increased correspondingly and the notion of caloric "shortfall" came more clearly into focus. Shortfall is the difference between a theoretical "minimum" number of calories which a person requires and the actual net calorie intake. Data from July 5th to date is provided in the ESTIMATED DAILY CALORIC SHORTFALL Table below. The "BURN" variable in the table represents calories burned by the body during exercise, an extraordinary work activity or other calory consuming activity. Gross intake less burn gives you net intake; minimum requirement less net gives you shortall. The table is current as of: November 7th. |
11/01/99 | 11/02/99 | 11/03/99 | 11/04/99 | 11/05/99 | 11/06/99 | 11/07/99 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INJURY TIME-OUT MAJOR SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MAJOR SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MAJOR SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MAJOR SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MAJOR SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MAJOR SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MAJOR SHT_FALL |
|
10/25/99 | 10/26/99 | 10/27/99 | 10/28/99 | 10/29/99 | 10/30/99 | 10/31/99 | |||||||
INJURY TIME-OUT MINIMAL SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MEDIUM SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MEDIUM SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MEDIUM SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MEDIUM SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MEDIUM SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MINIMAL SHT_FALL |
|
10/18/99 | 10/19/99 | 10/20/99 | 10/21/99 | 10/22/99 | 10/23/99 | 10/24/99 | |||||||
INJURY TIME-OUT MINIMAL SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MINIMAL SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MINIMAL SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MINIMAL SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MINIMAL SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MINIMAL SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MINIMAL SHT_FALL |
|
10/11/99 | 10/12/99 | 10/13/99 | 10/14/99 | 10/15/99 | 10/16/99 | 10/17/99 | |||||||
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2150 -1810 340 2000 -340 -1660 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1760 -1420 340 2000 -340 -1660 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1940 -1600 340 2000 -340 -1660 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2015 -1675 340 2000 -340 -1660 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2070 -1730 340 2000 -340 -1660 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1330 -990 340 2000 -340 -1660 |
INJURY TIME-OUT MODEST SHT_FALL |
|
10/04/99 | 10/05/99 | 10/06/99 | 10/07/99 | 10/08/99 | 10/09/99 | 10/10/99 | |||||||
INJURY TIME-OUT MODEST SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MODEST SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MODEST SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MODEST SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MODEST SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MODEST SHT_FALL |
|
INJURY TIME-OUT MODEST SHT_FALL |
|
9/27/99 | 9/28/99 | 9/29/99 | 9/30/99 | 10/01/99 | 10/02/99 | 10/03/99 | |||||||
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2285 -1945 340 2000 -340 -1660 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1420 -1080 340 2000 -340 -1660 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2020 -1680 340 2000 -340 -1660 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1835 -1380 455 2000 -455 -1545 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2440 -2100 340 2000 -340 -1660 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1815 -1475 340 2000 -340 -1660 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
980 -830 150 2000 -150 -1850 |
9/20/99 | 9/21/99 | 9/22/99 | 9/23/99 | 9/24/99 | 9/25/99 | 9/26/99 | |||||||
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1460 -1100 360 2000 -360 -1640 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1880 -1520 360 2000 -360 -1640 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2760 -2400 360 2000 -360 -1640 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2080 -1720 360 2000 -360 -1640 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2020 -1660 360 2000 -360 -1640 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1690 -1330 360 2000 -360 -1640 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1950 -1600 350 2000 -350 -1650 |
9/13/99 | 9/14/99 | 9/15/99 | 9/16/99 | 9/17/99 | 9/18/99 | 9/19/99 | |||||||
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1805 -1445 360 2000 -360 -1640 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1645 -1285 360 2000 -360 -1640 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1725 -1360 365 2000 -365 -1635 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1585 -1225 360 2000 -360 -1640 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1875 -1515 360 2000 -360 -1640 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1600 -1240 360 2000 -360 -1640 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1720 -1360 360 2000 -360 -1640 |
9/06/99 | 9/07/99 | 9/08/99 | 9/09/99 | 9/10/99 | 9/11/99 | 9/12/99 | |||||||
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2475 -2095 380 2000 -380 -1620 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2520 -1140 380 2000 -380 -1620 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1785 -1405 380 2000 -380 -1620 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1370 -1000 370 2000 370 -1630 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1955 -1575 380 2000 -380 -1620 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2070 -1690 380 2000 -380 -1620 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1440 -1060 380 2000 -380 -1620 |
8/30/99 | 8/31/99 | 9/01/99 | 9/02/99 | 9/03/99 | 9/04/99 | 9/05/99 | |||||||
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1940 -1555 385 2000 -385 -1615 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1440 -860 380 2000 -380 -1620 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1465 -1115 350 2000 -350 -1650 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1600 -1220 380 2000 -380 -1620 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
3000 -2620 380 2000 -380 -1620 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1465 -1090 375 2000 -375 -1625 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1885 -1505 380 2000 -380 -1620 |
8/23/99 | 8/24/99 | 8/25/99 | 8/26/99 | 8/27/99 | 8/28/99 | 8/29/99 | |||||||
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1305 -920 385 2000 -385 -1615 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1325 -940 385 2000 -385 -1615 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1847 -1460 387 2000 -387 -1613 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
865 -480 385 2000 -385 -1615 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1705 -1320 385 2000 -385 -1615 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1895 -1520 375 2000 -375 -1625 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2270 -1885 385 2000 -385 -1615 |
8/16/99 | 8/17/99 | 8/18/99 | 8/19/99 | 8/20/99 | 8/21/99 | 8/22/99 | |||||||
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1955 -1600 355 2000 -355 -1645 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1420 -1060 360 2000 -360 -1640 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1345 -970 375 2000 -375 -1625 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1400 -1010 390 2000 -390 -1610 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
- 2000 - - |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
515 -135 380 2000 -380 -1620 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1815 -1420 395 2000 -395 -1605 |
8/09/99 | 8/10/99 | 8/11/99 | 8/12/99 | 8/13/99 | 8/14/99 | 8/15/99 | |||||||
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1610 -1200 410 2000 -410 -1590 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1605 -1200 405 2000 -405 -1595 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1425 -1100 325 2000 -325 -1675 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
980 980 2000 -980 -1020 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1930 -1760 170 2000 -170 -1830 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1385 -1140 245 2000 -245 -1755 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1235 -795 440 2000 -440 -1560 |
8/02/99 | 8/03/99 | 8/04/99 | 8/05/99 | 8/06/99 | 8/07/99 | 8/08/99 | |||||||
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1520 -1060 460 2000 -460 -1540 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1495 -1020 475 2000 -475 -1525 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1520 -1050 470 2000 -470 -1530 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1495 -750 745 2000 -745 -1255 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1065 -790 275 2000 -275 -1725 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1435 -960 475 2000 -475 -1525 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2250 -1780 470 2000 -470 -1530 |
7/26/99 | 7/27/99 | 7/28/99 | 7/29/99 | 7/30/99 | 7/31/99 | 8/01/99 | |||||||
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1455 -960 495 2000 -495 -1505 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1125 -600 525 2000 -525 -1475 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1570 -1040 530 2000 -530 -1470 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1375 -840 535 2000 -535 -1465 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2000 -1480 520 2000 -520 -1480 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
680 -180 500 2000 -500 -1500 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1470 -960 510 2000 -510 -1490 |
7/19/99 | 7/20/99 | 7/21/99 | 7/22/99 | 7/23/99 | 7/24/99 | 7/25/99 | |||||||
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1875 -1200 675 2000 -675 -1325 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1575 -1000 575 2000 -575 -1425 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1390 -840 550 2000 -550 -1450 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1935 -1355 580 2000 -580 -1420 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1995 -1420 575 2000 -575 -1425 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
2065 -1490 575 2000 -575 -1425 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1675 -1130 545 2000 -545 -1455 |
7/12/99 | 7/13/99 | 7/14/99 | 7/15/99 | 7/16/99 | 7/17/99 | 7/18/99 | |||||||
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
890 -160 730 2000 -730 -1270 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1580 -940 640 2000 -640 -1360 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1250 -585 665 2000 -665 -1335 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1225 -600 675 2000 -675 -1325 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
825 -200 625 2000 -625 -1375 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1295 -840 455 2000 -455 -1545 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1455 -780 675 2000 -675 -1325 |
7/05/99 | 7/06/99 | 7/07/99 | 7/08/99 | 7/09/99 | 7/10/99 | 7/11/99 | |||||||
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
965 -760 205 2000 -205 -1795 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1550 -540 1010 2000 -1010 -990 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
980 -332 648 2000 -648 -1352 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1045 -320 725 2000 -725 -1275 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1225 -520 705 2000 -705 -1295 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1185 -660 525 2000 -525 -1475 |
INTAKE BURN NET MINIMUM LESS NET SHT_FALL |
1340 -720 620 2000 -620 -1380 |
The Hunger-Strike is now about to enter its final phase. During this phase, the daily calorie shortfall shall be gradually increased until the issue is finally resolved one way or the other. The daily calorie shortfall shall be gradually increased until the stonewalling is finally over, one way or the other! The daily calorie shortfall shall be gradually increased until the MURDEROUS STONEWALLING is finally over, one way or the other!!! |
PRESIDENT | ATTORNEY GENERAL | TREASURY SECRETARY |
TELE: 202 456 6797 | TELE: 202 514 2063 | TELE: 202 622 0064 |
FAX: 202 456 1907 | FAX: 202 514 4507 | FAX: 202 622 0073 |
email: president@whitehouse.gov | email: NONE | email: OPCMail@do.treas.gov |
|
PRESIDENT | ATTORNEY GENERAL | TREASURY SECRETARY |
TELE: 202 456 6797 | TELE: 202 514 2063 | TELE: 202 622 0064 |
FAX: 202 456 1907 | FAX: 202 514 4507 | FAX: 202 622 0073 |
email: president@whitehouse.gov | email: NONE | email: OPCMail@do.treas.gov |
DEC. 21, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 331/324; JUSTICE I
Justice, stonewallers, justice! Justice, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, justice! [DAY 331/324; BOILER PLATE] [BODY SHUTDOWN=324 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=35] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 22, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 332/325; JUSTICE II
Familiar words, aren't they. If there is oxymoronic justice for one, does this mean there shall be oxymoronic justice for all? Stonewallers, you have created a standard of oxymoronic justice for all! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, you have created a standard of oxymoronic justice for all!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=325 DAYS] [MA [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 23, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 333/326; JUSTICE III
Stonewallers, we know the choice if the matter is left in your hands! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, we know the choice if the matter is left in your hands!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=326 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=33] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 27, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 337/330; JUSTICE IV
For our hypothetical assume that impeachment proceedings are instituted against the highest elected officer of a sovereignty. Pre-trial proceedings sought to interrogate the officer about his allegiance to an adversary foreign country because of a visit he made to that country while he was in college. Specific charges include sexual harrassment of an aid. In a proceeding analogous to a pre-trial motion, it is ruled, without explanation, that the allegiance to an adversary foreign country issue would not be pursued. Our hypothetical further assumes that a formal hearing was held on the sexual harrassment charge which produced the following opinion by the hearing tribunal:
Mind you now, they say nothing whatsoever about remedying any other behavior. Stonewallers, is this truly the kind of justice you embrace? MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, is this truly the kind of justice you embrace??? Stonewallers, we know this is the justice you embrace when it is convenient for you to do so! MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS, we know this is the justice you embrace when it is convenient for you to do so!!! Return Code J10
[BODY SHUTDOWN=330 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=29] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM] DEC. 30, 1999 HUNGER STRIKE DAY 340/333; STATUS
Yes, they wrongfully suspended my access to the internet on Monday. Time, energy and resources, TERs folks, TERs. How many times have I written about TERs. And how much simpler a concept can there be? Conclusive of malice, isn't it. I was partially back on by mid-evening Monday, but not totally back until mid afternoon today, Thursday December 30th. Let's see now, on Monday there were approximately 30 days left within which to resolve this matter and escape death, weren't there. And, from Monday until now is about 3 days, isn't it. They helped themselves to 10%, or greater, of the remainder of my life unless the matter is successfully resolved, didn't they. How much of my life had you already helped yourself to, Stonewallers! How much of my life had you already helped yourself to, MURDEROUS STONEWALLERS!!!
[BODY SHUTDOWN=333 DAYS] [MAX DAYS TO FINAL RESOLUTION=26] [BODYWEIGHT LOSS>24%] [VICTIM'S AGE > 60] [MESSENGER NOT PROBLEM]
|